Biogen’s good news on aducanumab could ‘open the floodgates’ for Alzheimer’s drugs > NEWS

본문 바로가기

NEWS

NEWS
IP: ***.***.***.4.1

Biogen’s good news on aducanumab could ‘open the floodgates’ for Alzhe…

페이지 정보

최고관리자 조회수 : 2,603

본문

[하버드 의대 데니스 셀코 교수 칼럼]

- 지난 35년 동안 인간에 축적된 방대한 양의 신경병리학적, 생화학적, 바이오마커, 유전적 증거들과 광범위한 동물 모델들 모두는 "베타 아밀로이드"가 알츠하이머병의 Basic biology와 크게 관련되어 있음을 암시해 왔다.

- 나는 아두카누맙이 우리가 오랫동안 기다려온 돌파구라고 믿는다. 나는 아두카누맙이 시간의 테스트를 견뎌낼 것이라고 믿는다. 그러나 FDA가 현시점에서는 이 약을 승인하지 않기로 결정하더라도! "항아밀로이드 치료법"이 뇌의 임상적 특징과 병리적 변화 모두에 도움이 된다는 증거를 없앨 수는 없다!!!!!

 

One of the many things I’ve learned during four decades of doing research on Alzheimer’s disease is that the work always brings surprises. Biogen’s announcement on Tuesday about its experimental Alzheimer’s drug, aducanumab, was a big one.

Back in March, the company stopped two large Phase 3 clinical trials of the drug after futility analyses showed that aducanumab was unlikely to provide a benefit compared to placebo.

That decision was a blow to the hypothesis that a protein called beta-amyloid is a cause of Alzheimer’s. It cast a cloud over years of research, and many of us in the field began feeling like we were swimming upstream against pronouncements that anti-amyloid therapies won’t work. Several biopharmaceutical companies started rethinking their research in this area.

Biogen’s latest announcement is likely to give some in the field whiplash.

Why the reversal?

In the futility analyses, Biogen didn’t include some patients on the highest doses of aducanumab and some who had taken the drug for longer times. Since then, the company has included all trial participants. What emerged from the updated analyses is that the dose of aducanumab that gets across the blood-brain barrier and the duration of treatment matter.

This about-face highlights a problem. The all-or-none decisions represented by a futility analysis are sensible from a commercial perspective regarding how a company will fund further work. But they don’t make as much sense scientifically. In retrospect, it would have been ideal if Biogen had completed the analysis of all available data and then made its best judgment. That’s now happened.

Not long after Biogen’s decision to stop the trials, I wrote in Nature Reviews Neurology that when Biogen had a chance to look more closely at the data, it would likely observe some participants who benefited from aducanumab. At the time, I didn’t think the later analyses would be as good as what I heard Tuesday morning, which is that one of the two trials fully achieved its primary and secondary endpoints.

When Biogen pulled the plug on its aducanumab trials in March, some Alzheimer’s researchers, journalists, and members of the public called for stopping, or at least curtailing, work based on the amyloid hypothesis. I didn’t agree. A massive amount of neuropathological, biochemical, biomarker, and genetic evidence in humans accrued over the last 35 years, along with extensive animal modeling, all suggested that beta-amyloid is very likely implicated in the basic biology of Alzheimer’s disease.

Instead of stopping the work, we needed to move ahead with better trials, even though aducanumab had apparently failed in Phase 3. By better I mean trials conducted among individuals at earlier stages of the disease, or among those with positive beta-amyloid scans or those who have elevated levels of another key protein, tau, in their cerebrospinal fluid. Another target group could be individuals with the “purest” form of Alzheimer’s — those without significant vascular lesions or any evidence of so-called mixed dementia.

In this regard, the development of biomarkers measured in blood samples, including certain forms of the beta-amyloid and tau proteins, is coming along quickly. This work is timely if earlier identification of the disease means greater chances that therapy with aducanumab or other agents can help prevent, or at least modify, memory loss and other symptoms such as trouble doing everyday activities.

Biogen’s positive re-analyses of the aducanumab data represent an important proof of concept: a drug can meaningfully affect clinical symptoms in Alzheimer’s. For the industry, it’s a signal that should enable it to go forward with other anti-amyloid trials as well as with trials targeting tau, microglial inflammation, and more.

The news is also important for people with early Alzheimer’s, or at risk for it. Some patients of mine who seemed anecdotally to be doing well as they participated in the aducanumab trials were crushed when Biogen announced that the drug didn’t work and the company wasn’t going to provide it anymore. Biogen has announced that patients who had volunteered to take part in the trials, at some risk and trouble to themselves, should be able to take it again.

Scientists like me have been waiting for something to work, to give us confidence that we were at least on the right track. I have always believed that once a drug looked like it worked and got across the finish line with the FDA, it would open the floodgates to make better versions. I’m not talking about me-too drugs, but ones that actually work better than the first ones.

Take, for example, lovastatin (Mevacor), the first statin approved by the FDA in 1987. It was later clinically eclipsed by atorvastatin (Lipitor) and other “more modern” statins. A similar thing has occurred with blood pressure drugs.

I believe that aducanumab is the breakthrough we have long been waiting for, one that I believe will stand the test of time. But even if the FDA decides not to approve the drug at this point, it can’t take away the evidence that anti-amyloid approaches, even in people who already have symptoms, can benefit both clinical features and pathological changes in the brain.

This roller coaster has been frustrating for patients, their families, researchers, and those in the pharmaceutical industry. It indicates that neurodegenerative disease is very complex and we need to continuously second-guess our assumptions and our findings.

Dennis J. Selkoe, M.D, is co-director of the Ann Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and professor of neurologic diseases at Harvard Medical School in Boston.


https://www.statnews.com/2019/10/23/aducanumab-news-open-floodgates-alzheimers-drugs/?utm_campaign=stat_plus_today&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=78459063&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--ohcfWlcZVsrzgyBGUAqzml_YgmQ3kXMs_xU8G2TNoXcYvKWe7IQXc84MwKKgMpjBCRG1g_KRe1HgPXMAo6z1oPb7gwQ&_hsmi=78459063&fbclid=IwAR3hoeY2tsd-m_dGE0HWjrfOSV02e1Q78lNZ--wO-zKj3at9fF3L2uzQKV8

NEWS 목록
No 제목 이름 조회
428 최고관리자 2576
427 최고관리자 2506
426 최고관리자 2571
425 최고관리자 2580
424 최고관리자 2628
423 최고관리자 2544
422 최고관리자 2608
421 최고관리자 2566
420 최고관리자 2586
419 최고관리자 2560
418 최고관리자 2503
417 최고관리자 2604
416 최고관리자 2388
415 최고관리자 2466
414 최고관리자 2428
대표 : 김좌진 ㅣ 개인정보관리 : 김좌진 ㅣ 사업자번호 : 253-86-01081 ㅣ 통신판매업신고: 2018-대전동구-0190호
본사 : 대전광역시 동구 충정로 21, 4105호 ㅣ 기업부설연구소 : 대전광역시 동구 충정로 21, 4104호
당사는 모든 이미지의 무단사용을 금하며, 무단사용시 저작권법 98조에 의거 민형사상 책임을 지게됩니다.
COPYRIGHT ©2019 (주)프로셀컴퍼니. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.